Jo Husafet Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 ^jel ovo vinjetira ko besno po difoltu il si ga malo nasviiro. Msm, daleko da smeta... no sam radoznao :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odysseus Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 Nezla, je l' ti to koristis DX 35-icu sa 35mm filmskim aparatom? Edit: Mislim da bi potvrdan odgovor na moje pitanje bio ujedno i (posredan) odgovor na Dzoovo pitanje. ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nezla Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 po difoltu... cim zavrnem preko 3.0 pocinje da se vidi zesce... u sustini ponekada skidam, a skoro nikada ne dodajem... ebiga DX objektiv na nikonu F80, ipak je to ff telo... :D Isti objektiv, isti aparat, isti film... edit: da objektiv 35 1.8G DX i film telo( kako ga ja odmilja zovem moje FF telo-Nikon f80) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cvele001 Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 Cvele@ sta ti je ovo Dz ili De staklo...? Nezla, aj mi objasni pitanje.... glup sam... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cvele001 Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 Nije bokeh ali je DX na FX telu... cisto da se nadovezem na Nezlin post... iza / behind by cvele001, on Flickr Vigneta Dominator... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nezla Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 ^^^^ izvini malo preterah da li je G(novo) ili D(stro) staklo.... u efiksu pise samo AFS... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cvele001 Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 Ma sve cool.... pa AFS je novo... 50mm 1.8 AFS G... pored njega imas samo jos jedan AFS to je 1.4... Bovo i radi maestralno... po meni dve klase bolje od stare pedestice.. pogotovo bokeh... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nezla Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 iskreno i ne obracam paznju da li je AF-s ili samo AF, vise gledam koji je F i da li je G ili D... pa nacuo sam da to staklo bolje radi , pa reko da proverim iz prve ruke :D ...a' vidim za pozetak da su ubili tu nervozu sa stare 50-tice...jos se samo nadam da je koristan i na 1.8 kao i 35-ca ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cvele001 Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 Izrazito koristan... ako oces moz da probas... Odlicno staklo... bez da me neko pogresno shvati, mislim da je cak bolje od 1.4 i to ne samo po ostrini... BRZ AF, dobar bokeh, ostrina uravnostezena po celom kadru... U sustini je ostrina mozda jos i najmanje unapredjena ali je zato dosta kontrastniji... Topla preporuka... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odysseus Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 Ja sam takodje procitao na par mesta da je po pitanju bokeh-a f/1.8G pedesetica bolja od f/1.4-ke (posledica, najverovatnije, prilicno drugacije konstrukcije pre svega). Nevertheless, kada budem kupio D700 (how-yes-no), moci cu da koristim svoju 35-icu! :D Kao sto i neko ko kupi D800(e), moze da stavi tu 35-icu i sve to vozi u DX rezimu! :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nidzza Posted March 11, 2012 Report Share Posted March 11, 2012 Imah prilike da probam :D 5D i Rokkor 58 na 1.2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stelya Posted March 11, 2012 Report Share Posted March 11, 2012 ^ Woohoo! Evo ga jos jedan Rocco :) A ovako izgleda daljinski kada pijani hocete da menjate kanale : CZJ Flekica 35 2.4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rastamon Posted March 11, 2012 Report Share Posted March 11, 2012 coming soon ... ;) Tamronche 17-50 kein stabilisation ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
puckons Posted March 11, 2012 Report Share Posted March 11, 2012 Tamron 17-50 mit stabilsation na 47 - 3,2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stelya Posted March 11, 2012 Report Share Posted March 11, 2012 a shta je to bilo iza kad toliko svetluca? :) meni super, ja svog nisam jos doveo u takvu situaciju da izbaci vako nesto... :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DzULA Posted March 11, 2012 Report Share Posted March 11, 2012 Neki prozor sa dekoriranim staklom ;))) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
puckons Posted March 11, 2012 Report Share Posted March 11, 2012 ne nego zalazak sunca plus isprskan prozor vodom iz pumpice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stelya Posted March 11, 2012 Report Share Posted March 11, 2012 lukavo lukavo :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jo Husafet Posted March 11, 2012 Report Share Posted March 11, 2012 bajdvej, isti fazon, samo mnogo kontrolisaniji moze da se uradi i sa UV filterom koji se naprska cetkicom za zube. Premaz moze da varira od blatnjave vode, preko kapljica u boji do paste za zube. Sitne kapljice na pravoj blendi umeju da budu uber fin fazon, instant hipsteraj :) elem... pentax 50mm 1.4, otvoren na superiji. Puter s' dzemom. Bez 'leba. :D Sara by Vladimir Krzalic, on Flickr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
civi Posted March 11, 2012 Report Share Posted March 11, 2012 cika Jo , el si imao prilike da probas neko 55 1.2 staklence i kolko se realno razlikuje od tog smc takumara el to multicoated ili obicna , islo bi na staru petardu Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jo Husafet Posted March 12, 2012 Report Share Posted March 12, 2012 Probao sam Stelyinog Rokora 58 1.2 i jes' malkice muljav na 1.2 ali meni ne smeta. Cak sta vise... it's not a bug - it's a feature. Lud totalno ali i on osetljiv na hajlajte, mada prjatnoga bokeha. Pentax je SMC, OVA verzija. Nisam siguran da li je ista opticka formula kao Takumar, mada mislim da jeste. Na staroj petardi kaci negde na 10ak meteri dok pentax ne moze uopste zbog poluge blende i stitnika. Pentax ne crta lepo objekte koji su ispred polja dubinske ostrine, pogotovo ne kas su tu hajlajti.. krene da biva bas muljavo. Al' zato ono iza... savrsenstvo. Ovo mi je bas fetis staklo. Tesko da nesto moze da mu stane na crtu po pitanju kvaliteta bokeha (moj licni sud... ne mora bit' tacan niti objektivan). To sve dok ne nadjem Pentax 50mm 1.2 koji ne kosta ko Fiat Punto. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
civi Posted March 12, 2012 Report Share Posted March 12, 2012 pa to se skine? il jok? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jo Husafet Posted March 12, 2012 Report Share Posted March 12, 2012 Ako skine onda moz' na EOS ali na pentax telima ne radi fokusiranje i merenje na svim blendama posto nema sta da pokrene polugu. KAcenje u teoriji moze da se izbegne ako se obrije parce prstena u koji je uglavnjen zadnji element ali je pipavo jer se radi sa strugotinom na ispod milimetra od stakla. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
civi Posted March 12, 2012 Report Share Posted March 12, 2012 to je za 50 f1.4 ovaj? izgleda da cu ni kriv ni duzan da uzmem 1.2 al mozda i on treba da se struze? ovo je 1.2 isto pk mount Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dghagi Posted March 12, 2012 Report Share Posted March 12, 2012 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. SMC Pentax 1.2/50 sve na 1.2 5. je 550d gde se vidi sa kojom lakoćom puni 18mp senzor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now