Jump to content

gornjane

Članovi
  • Posts

    291
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://www.earth-blade.com

Profile Information

  • Location
    NS
  • Interests
    http://www.earth-blade.com<br />http://community.webshots.com/user/gornjane<br />http://www.photo.net/photodb/user?user_id=1155126<br />http://photobucket.com/albums/a14/gornjane/<br />http://www.usefilm.com/photographer/70534.html

Previous Fields

  • Ime i prezime
    S. M.

gornjane's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

0

Reputation

  1. Postovani zastitnici Srebrnog jezera: I tereba da uzivamo u pobedi gosteci se! Ali nemojte se opustati, Mracne sile vrebaju i pritajeno iscekuju svoj trenutak... Budimo na oprezu i stitimo nas Fruskogoski Dragulj. Vas saborac, S.M.
  2. gornjane

    HDR?

    Postovani ljubitelji HDR foto-tehnike: Bas je dobro kada vas kritikuju, ali je jos lepse kada vas hvale. Sujeta, to je ono sto drama nas FA. I mene, naravno... o) Hvala Abdee, hvala Sadi... na kritikama. HVALA Che, HVALA Artintact... na pohvalama. Prodao sam celu seriju... Ima jos uvek dobrih ljudi koji su spremni da daju neku "sicu" za "neobuzdane" HDR-tvorevine! o) Nazalost, sve sto je lepo - kratko traje. Moj buduci poslodavac nema bas razumevanje za moj hobi, za moju strast prema HDR. Trazi mi plan, program, lekcije, prezentacije... i pomalo preti! Proslog meseca sam dobio "zuti karton", jer sam svoja predavanja u Austriji odlozio za pocetak sledece godine. Drugi "zuti" me moze diskfalifkovati? Nema sale, prodao sam se za "saku dolara" i sada moram da ispastam. Novi Gazda me tesi da mogu predivne HDR fotografije da uradim u Alpima, ali prvo posao, pa zadovoljstvo. To dobar razlog zasto nisam, niti cu ikada za stalno, napustio ovaj Raj na nasoj maloj plavoj Planeti. Zasto sve ovo pisem? Zato sto ne mogu vise da nastavim polemiku sa vama u vezi HDR, a bas mi je godila! Zaista sam uzivao! o) A vama Zonasima porucujem samo jedno: ZIVOT NEMA REPRIZU, ISKORISTITE GA OPTIMALNO! Srecni vam predstojeci Praznici i budite ponos nase Velike Zajednice! Vas, S.M.
  3. Veoma interesanto S.! Pozdrav, S.M.
  4. Zdravo Gezo: Ti si bas odlucio da "maknes" lovu? Ako ovako nastavis, bice para. Ali, ako sefica za to dozna, bice zla. o) Pozdrav, S.M.
  5. Dete moje: Postavio si pravo pitanje uz pravu fotografiju. Nema sta, bolesni smo do "panja". Da li je to samo zbog Mracne strane ljudskog bica (do pre desetak hiljada godina covek je bio pretezno kanibal), ili zbog onoga sto nam se nedavno desilo (pa je svo Zlo isplivano na povrsinu), ja to ne znam. A, da li ima dna? Izgleda da je odgovor cista nesreca - NE! Dete moje, nema nikakvog opravdanja za ovako nesto. o( Neka te Svevisnji cuva od izazova Tame, dete moje. Iskreno, cika S.M.
  6. Postovanje majstore M.! Odlicna serija. Valeri su perfektni! Prva i poslednja su mi najbolje. Posedno mi se dopada to sto foto-model ima mali i nezni "stomacic", a ne "cvornovatu dsaku" poput nekog bildera... o) Puno uspeha, majstore. S.M.
  7. Postovanje! Zaista sam u dilemi cemu da se priklonim: Da ili Ne? Kada bi bilo neko srednje resenje, ja bi najpre za njega glasao. Manipulacija? DA, ali uz neke ograde. Koje su to ograde? Da ne bi izmisljao "rupu na svirali", ja se priklanjam merilima koja je "propisao", po mnogima, najbolji foto-sajt na svetu www.photo.net. I evo sta kazu Fotonetovci: ----------------------------------------------------- What is an unmanipulated image? Our definition is very strict; we ask that people checking the box do not mentally create their own definition, or take the following only as guidelines or suggestions. If the photograph does not literally meet these requirements please do not check the "unmanipulated" box. On photo.net an unmanipulated photograph is one that could be presented in a court of law or printed in a newspaper, without dishonesty or perjury by the photographer, as an accurate record of what the photographer saw and the camera captured, with the absolute minimum disturbance of the capture during the processing and finishing stages. A slide processed through standard chemistry is the paradigm for an unmanipulated image, and other types of photographs should strive, within the limits of technology, to be as close as possible to slides with respect to manipulation. Futhermore, * The image should be the result of a single exposure (shutter release) by the camera. Therefore, stitched panoramic images, multiple exposures, or composites of more than one image are all manipulated images for our purposes here. * Contrast adjustments and color balance adjustments may be made in enlargement and printing, scanning software, image editing software, etc, as may selective darkening or lightening of areas of the photograph (dodging and burning). But these should not be so extreme as to render the image an inaccurate or unrealistic representation of what the photographer saw. (It is not intended that this be interpreted in some psychological way -- for example that Van Gogh's colors were in some subjective sense what he "saw".) Features may not be so darkened or lightened or changed in color that the effect is the same as if they were removed by a cloning tool. All images on photo.net are digital files, and most of these go through post-exposure color space conversions. We don't state what transformations are allowed, but the emphasis should be on realism and the result should be as true to the original as practical, or at least should not be any more unrealistic than the effects produced by selecting normally available films. * Sharpening tools are OK. * Cloning/airbrushing tools may only be used to remove miniscule processing artifacts, such as produced by dust, not to add features that were not captured by the camera or to move or remove unwanted features that were captured. * No use of blurring tools is allowed. * No use of perspective correction tools is allowed. Any perspective correction must be done pre-exposure through camera movements or PC lenses. * Cropping is OK. * Images created by processing film through non-standard chemistry such as "cross processing" are manipulated images. * Pre-exposure manipulations such as staging scenes before the camera are OK, but should be disclosed in the Technical Details if the "unmanipulated" box is checked, and the caption should not lead the viewer to any false conclusions, such as implying that an animal is in the wild, when it was actually photographed in a zoo. * colorizing a black and white image is not allowed. * desaturating a color image to make it black and white is OK, provided the desaturation is complete and not selective. It should be emphasized that there is no requirement that all images submitted to photo.net meet these requirements. These standards apply only to images that are declared by the photographer to be "unmanipulated". ----------------------------------------------------- Vise o tome ovde: http://www.photo.net/photodb/manipulation Koliko ja mogu maksimalno sebi da dopustim u manipulaciji fotografijom? Pa, ovo je valjda moj maksimum: http://www.photo.net/photodb/ratings-break...hoto_id=5212870 Vise od toga - ne ide! Nadam se? o) Jos jednom da naglasim, tema je veoma interesantna i moje velike cestitke autoru za pokretanje iste, ali i onima koji su o njoj polemisali na veoma visokom strucnom i etickom nivou. Bravo Zonasi! Srecno. S.M.
  8. Prva fotografija je veoma dobra N. Pozdrav, S.M.
  9. Fantasticna fotografija Z., Pravo malo remek delo komplementarinih boja! Srecno, S.M.
  10. gornjane

    HDR?

    Postovanje ljubitelji HDR: Mislim da rasprave ove vrste ne vode nikuda? Jeste-nije? Jeste, 100%, po onome kako se definise HDR... Drugo, scene nisu nikako ujednaceno osvetljene i to se moze videti sa "sirovih" snimaka. Posebno su izrazene senke! Nazalost, najbolji DFA na svetu, Fuji FP S9500 u rafalnom modu nema bas sirok raspon u podesavanju ekspozicije. Eh, nista nije savrseno. o) Da li treba biti pazljiv pri primeni HDR tehnike? I Da i Ne. Ne, jer ako ste obican FA to je stvar vaseg ubedjenja i vaseg stava prema onome sto radite, te vase volje da eksperimentisete. I svi HDR eksperimenti, osim poslenjeg, ce biti manje vise - neuspesni! Ako prodajete to sto radite, to je onda druga prica... Onda ce o "zloupotrebi" HDRa odluciti kupac. o) Ako zelite, rasprava na temu "jeste-nije", "da-ne"... se moze nastaviti. Meni stvarno ne smeta. Ali, mozda je bolje da pokazemo vise HDR fotografija, pa da sa tih dela, a ne price - ucimo? A, mozda je bolje samo da pricamo? Mozda smo u pricanju bolji? o) Jos jednom, zelim vam ugodan vikend. I puno lepih HDR dela, naravno. Bice lepog vremena, pa eto prilike za velika HDR dela... Srecno, S.M.
  11. Postovanje D., Necu da ponavljam onu cuvenu recenicu: "Ken je tvoj..." o) http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/perspective.htm Ali, mozda ce i da ti pomogne? Ali, to ces nam ti reci... Neka ti projekat bude uspesan! Profesionalci ne odustaju lako! o) Srecno, S.M.
  12. gornjane

    HDR?

    Punokrvni HDR, Abdee! Hocu da kazem 100% HDR! Imam tri svedoka, a imam i originalne fotografije! o) Fotografije (serija) su snimljene u veoma losim svetlosnim uslovima (sumrak, senke...), najboljim DFA na svetu Fuji FP S9500. Mesto snimanja je potocic (bezimeni?) na FG u relativnoj (?) blizini Ledinackog jezera. HDR je uradjen sa probnom verzijom programa Photomatix v. 2.2.1. I nikakve intervencije na fotografijama nakon toga nije bilo... o) Ugodan vikend. S.M.
  13. Postovani D., Jako mi se dopadaju boje i kompozicija tvoje fotografije. Prava jesenja postavka... o) Srecno, S.M.
  14. Zdravo P., Rodjen je novi pejzaz-majstor! Neka mu je sa srecom! S.M.
×
×
  • Create New...